- Jon Ralston, Attorney Jay Brown Asks Client for $37,500 Nonrefundable Fee, 9% of Business, RALSTON REPORTS (May 14, 2014)
- Client Interests Live on for Conflicts Purposes, Legal Profession Blog (July 30, 2010, 12:22).
- Willfully Failing to Learn of Conflict, Legal Profession Blog (Feb. 24, 2014), (describing an amendment proposed by the Virginia State Bar to modify Rule 1.10).
- Jeffrey S. Shapiro, Wendy Davis’ Attorney-Candidate Conflicts; Texan’s Dual Role Could Raise Ethics Questions, THE Washington Times, Apr. 16, 2014.
- So v. Suchanek, 670 F.3d 1304 (D.C. Cir. 2012).
- McGriff v. Christie, 477 F. App'x. 673 (11th Cir. 2012).
- Santiago v. Evans, 547 F. App'x. 923 (11th Cir. 2013).
- U.S. v. Titus, 475 F. App'x. 826, 835 (4th Cir. 2012).
- Bowers v. Ophthalmology Group, 733 F.3d 647 (6th Cir. 2013).
- U.S. v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 734 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2013).
- In re Neuhardt, 321 P.3d 833 (Mont. 2014).
- Northam v. Virginia State Bar, 737 S.E.2d 905 (Va. 2013).
- Georgia State Bar Formal Advisory Opinion 10-1, approved by the Georgia Supreme Court, applies the conflict of interest provisions in Ga. St. Bar R. 4-102(d):1.10(a) to a circuit public defender’s office as though that office was a private law firm. In re Formal Advisory Opinion 10-1, 744 S.E.2d 798 (Ga. 2013).
- Brown v. Florida Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, No. 4:09-CV-171-RS-CAS, 2012 WL 4758150 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 5, 2012).
- Conn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.11(a). In re Nyasia H., 76 A.3d 757 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013).
- West Virginia ex rel. Clifford v. West Virginia Office of Disc. Counsel, 745 S.E.2d 225 (W. Va. 2013).
- Dunn Cty. Human Services v. Eric R., 822 N.W.2d (Wis. Ct. App. 2012).
- Hodge v. URFA-Sexton, LP, 758 S.E.2d 314 (Ga. 2014).
- Illinois v. Keisha C., 966 N.E.2d 1139 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
- Disc. Counsel v. Cicero, 982 N.E.2d 650 (Ohio 2012).
- Zalewski v. Shelroc Homes, LLC, 856 F. Supp. 2d. 426 (N.D. N.Y. 2012).
Risk Management Best Practices Database Legal Statement
Information provided by Attorney Protective is not intended as legal advice. This publication provides best practices for use in connection with general circumstances, and ordinarily does not address specific situations. These best practices are not intended to meet or establish the standard of care, and sometimes recommend practices that exceed the standard of care. Specific situations should be discussed with legal counsel licensed in the appropriate jurisdiction. By publishing practice and risk prevention tips, Attorney Protective neither implies nor provides any guarantee that claims can be prevented by use of the suggested practices. Though the contents of Attorney Protective's Best Practice Database have been carefully researched, Attorney Protective makes no warranty as to the accuracy, applicability or timeliness of the content. Anyone wishing to reproduce any part of the Attorney Protective Best Practices Database content must request permission from Attorney Protective by calling 877-728-8776 or sending an email to firstname.lastname@example.org. Additionally the rules cited in the contents of this database may have since changed. You should check the laws and model rules in your state for specific information on the topics addressed here.